Alright. Hopefully, everyone can see that.
So welcome. Glad you’re here. Today, we’re gonna be talking about something every Earthworks team deals with, and that’s the gap between what’s happening on-site and what you actually know about it.
That gap tends to be the place where margin disappears, which obviously no one wants. By the end of this session, you’ll have a clear picture of how to close that gap using site data that you can act on same day as opposed to same week.
Quick housekeeping, a few things Chelsea already mentioned, we’re recording today. So if you do need to share this with someone on your team, we’ll send a link to all registrants afterwards. Drop questions in the chat anytime, please. We’ll tackle a number of them in the q and a section at the very end. Or if there’s one that’s particularly relevant to something we’re talking about in the moment, I think Chelsea is just gonna grab it and read it out. So please feel free to populate that.
Attendees are muted to keep things clean, but please use reactions. I think that’s an option here to let us know that you’re with us. We’re aiming for about forty five minutes of content and then about fifteen minutes of q and a.
But I did just practice and we are a little bit short of forty five minutes, which I don’t think anyone will complain about if we end a little bit early, get some time back.
So I think that’s everything. Let’s jump into it.
We’ll do two polls, I think, throughout this presentation just to try to keep it interesting. And depending on the outcome, I might tailor the content just a little bit.
So the first question, let me see if I can set it live.
Okay. Hopefully, that should be coming through shortly.
So where has unplanned drift from the project plan, something I’m sure everyone has experienced, where does that create the biggest issues or the biggest headaches downstream?
Is it scheduled delays, like missed milestones? Is it the rework from design changes? Is it budget overruns? Is it dispute is disputes around progress or something else entirely? Let us know. I’m sure for many of you, it’s gonna be more than one of these things, but maybe just pick the most impactful in your opinion.
We’ll just let this run for, like, I don’t know, fifteen more seconds.
Cool. Here we can close it there.
Budget overruns seems to be popular.
You close that poll.
Yeah. So makes sense. Like, every schedule delays, rework, disputes, all kind of type. Like, what what’s the end result of all of that is you go over budget, of course.
Cool.
So quick intros before we start the various sections here. So I’m Jack. I’m a product manager here at Propeller. I’m joined by my colleague, Chelsea. And today, we’re gonna walk you through four main sections. We’ll look at what delayed visibility actually costs and how those costs can compound. And then we’ll walk through how teams close that gap, followed by some role specific examples that I’m sure we have representation from from each in this room.
And then we’ll wrap with q and a. So section one.
This is the why it matters piece, and it’s a relatively short one.
Rarely is it the case that projects blow up overnight. It’s really more of a slow burn. A machine sits idle for a few hours and no one flags it. Cut fill starts diverging from the design between survey cycles, not by a lot at first, maybe even hardly noticeable, but then a little more the next time and a little more the next time and a little more the next time.
The foreman who’s running the morning briefings off last week’s picture of what the site looked like. And then by the time the reporting catches up, the window to course correct is way, way smaller than it needed to be.
The pattern is typically the same. Idle equipment goes unnoticed, design drift gets caught a little bit late, change orders go in without the data to back them up. And often, it’s not the teams that aren’t paying attention. It’s usually just that the visibility isn’t quite there quick enough.
So what does it actually look like to close that visibility gap?
Propeller’s approach is a connected workflow rather than three separate tools that you have to stitch together on your end.
It starts with survey capture, and generally, this is from a drone using arrow points for survey grade accuracy, which is around three centimeters, tenth of a foot as most of you on this call probably know.
That gives you orthomosaics, surfaces, and point clouds that beautifully represent existing conditions when the site was flown.
But, of course, you’re probably not gonna fly the drone or do a handheld scan every hour of every day necessarily.
In between drone flights, Dirt Mate updates your site model as often as every thirty minutes, and that all feeds into this third step here, the Propeller platform, where you get design overlays, cut fill volumes, machine utilization, and reporting all in one place.
A small anecdote here. We have a feature request channel. It’s an internal channel here at Propeller. And anyone from the business can do a short write up there and it really, really helps the product and engineering teams, honestly, in their effort to prioritize what to build next.
Typically, the feature requests are submitted by customer success, tech support, sales, customer service, since those are all the people in Propeller that are on the front lines interacting with customers on a daily basis.
And we’re lucky enough to have customers that aren’t shy about telling us what they want, which is great.
One of the most requested features, especially recently, has been what people are referring to as saved views. And I think I know why it’s been coming up an increasing amount.
When you log into Propeller and you jump into the Propeller platform and jump into your site in Propeller, there’s you’re just looking at the base map or it could be your most recent drone survey. But really nothing else is turned on on the map. It’s kind of a clean slate.
And as we add more to the Propeller platform and make it more powerful, there are more and more ways to configure that view of your site.
I’ve seen customers flip on ten multicolor polygons on the map that represent different zones of their project, a cross section that’s popped up from the bottom with four past surveys and three design surfaces all loaded up into that nice interactive chart.
I’ve seen customers with, know, they right click on the design file and then they get the right hand side panel pop out also in this view and they’re inspecting the metadata of that design file.
And then on top of all of that, if they’re running Dirt Mate, they have that Dirt Mate layer turned on. So a bunch of machines are running around their site in real time. It truly looks like mission control, right? We saw a couple of shots of that from the Artemis two launch from a few weeks back.
It’s a lot, but it’s beautiful and it’s effective for them. Of course, you don’t need to configure your view in this exact way. You could very easily just flip on one design file, one measurement and get the information that you need out of the platform.
There’s not really a right or wrong way to use it necessarily.
But you can imagine the people that do have those crazy views configured and they’re treating it like Mission Control, they’re the ones that are singing loudly for this saved views type feature.
And all this would mean was would be like remember my mission control setup when I log back in.
We do have a trimmed down version of saved views right now, which I’m more than happy to go into detail on at the end of this presentation. If anyone has questions, just send a note in there and I can answer questions or talk about it a little bit later. But it is something that we’re looking to make better in the future. But the main reason I tell this story is just to highlight this connected workflow. It’s this nice harmony between numerous tools that paints an extremely clear picture of what’s happening on-site in the Propeller platform.
Timeline tool, right? Something that user in my previous example didn’t have pulled up, one of a few things they didn’t have pulled up, but they totally could have.
This is about seeing your site evolve over time.
Imagine you have a few drone surveys loaded into Propeller. Your project has been progressing. And let’s just say for for this example, let’s say it was a grind and overlay highway project.
The very first drone survey, maybe before work began, you drew a big measurement that outlined your area of work on the road, and you got a square footage out of it. Work happens, you fly again. More work happens, you fly it again. And with each flight, you’re tracing out the area of the road that’s changing, whether you’re at the grinding or the paving phase.
What you can actually do is flip on the polygon you drew after some work happened, slide that timeline tool back to the original. So now you’re looking at a measurement that represents the work you did overlaying on what the site looked like before work began.
Then you use that what the site looked like before we began as the context to draw another polygon that butts up right against where the work was done. And that one obviously would represent what’s left to be done.
Of course, you could have just done a little subtraction problem between the two measurements to figure out what’s left, but I’m sure everyone on this call knows as well as me, visually showing an area on the map is often a far more effective means than showing some math on a piece of paper, especially when it comes to change order discussions.
And by the way, that workflow I described is actually easier than what I made it out to be. In many cases, you don’t even need to draw those particular areas yourself. We have a tool in Propeller called Magic Polygon that actually detects color changes in the ortho photo and will automatically draw areas around similar color. So grind and overlay project, perfect example of that, where you could probably just shift click and it would get the exact area that you wanted.
So drone photos give you a picture of the site at a given point in time.
Dirt Mate, on the other hand, is more of a stream of data. For those that don’t know, Dirt Mate sits on top of your equipment and as the Dirt Mate equipped machines do work on your site, they are paintbrushing new surfaces every thirty minutes. And this ensures every time that you look at your site in propeller, the terrain shown is the latest and greatest.
Other perks of Dirt Mate beyond just surfaces, things like machine utilization rates. How often is my machine moving? How often is it still?
Load counts. Right? Drop a pin on the map or designate another Dirtmate to be that pin and say when any piece of equipment comes within fifty feet of this pin, log a load and then specify a different pin. And then any machine that comes within a hundred feet of that pin, log a dump. Or we also have algorithms that can do this automatically for you if you wish.
Idle time versus runtime, another thing. Right? You could say how often is my machine running but not moving? Maybe there’s an opportunity to save on fuel costs in that situation. So Dirt Mate helps with all of this.
Two capabilities that I’ve alluded to a fair bit already, but that underpin a lot of this daily decision making are cut fill volume tracking and design overlays.
So cut fill volume tracking lets you measure actual earthwork volumes against a design surface or against other surveys or against Dirt Mate surface data or against a Frankenstein combination of drone data and Dirt Mate data very, very accurately.
Of course, we’d love if you did everything in Propeller, but we’re not quite naive enough to think that we can do absolutely everything yet.
But that does mean that we’ve put a lot of work into our exports. At the very end of this presentation, if there’s questions, I’m happy to go into more detail about all the various exports we have. But everything from PDF reports that represent your volumetric analysis, all the way through like the source status, like the ortho photos, the DXF, the contours, the terrains at whatever resolution and whatever file type that you’d like.
Design overlays, that’s the other big one.
When you’re not comparing to design, like often happens in cut, fill, volume tracking, you can just use design overlays for general QAQC. One of my very favorite hidden gems in Propeller is this design overlay feature that lets you tuck your design file behind the survey. So you turn on your design file. Right?
It’s overlaid nicely on your map. You can see the entire thing. There’s a button that you can click in Repeller that will put the parts of the design file that fall below the survey data out of view or under the map. And all that remains is what’s above the terrain.
So if you’re just looking for a quick snapshot, you don’t necessarily need volumetrics in the moment.
And let’s just say, for example, you’re on an import job. This is a super quick and easy way to see the areas that need more dirt.
The last two capabilities here that really help close that visibility gap are operator efficiency and automated reporting.
So operator efficiency. The story I like to think of here is one related to fleet management decisions.
At the beginning of a job, you obviously have the work that the estimator did. He did the job at six scrapers, two dozers, etcetera, whatever. And let’s say you deploy that fleet, but then checking your Dirt Mate data in a couple days, you know, after the project’s progressed a little bit, you notice that your utilization across the board on all of your equipment is totally maxed out. Everyone is running full bore, which makes you think maybe there’s some room for additional iron on this project. So you start that conversation with your foreman.
Or of course the opposite, right? You start to see lower utilization numbers, which maybe is indicative that you have too much equipment on-site. It could also be something else, of course. But regardless, it’s a really great insight to have.
And then automated reporting.
You don’t necessarily need to log in to Propeller to get a quick snapshot of what’s happening on your site. You can set up daily, weekly, monthly, you know, whatever, Dirt Mate automated emails that will tell you how much has been moved, how many loads, in what areas, all that.
One more quick poll, I think. Yep.
What is the cause most often for why site conditions start diverging from the plans? And let me launch this.
Hopefully, that launched.
Few options here. So plan updates are just hard to keep synced. Field changes are captured after the fact. Progress data not refreshed often enough.
Or just the fact that we have multiple teams working on a project and they all rely on different softwares, different files, different tools, or something else.
Again, this is probably a situation where it’s more than one of these for most of you, I would guess.
Let it go for a few seconds.
I realized I didn’t add the other one to stage. We can have a little quicker look at this one.
Interesting. So cool. Different files or tools. That makes a lot of sense.
I mean, that just kinda reminds me how important interoperability is between all these systems. So, like, of course, the nice open source formats like DXF files, pretty much any tool can read those.
But when you’re exporting things from one system, importing them to another system, you lose a bit of that collaboration.
Like, for example, comments in Propeller, can’t there’s not really a good way to get those from one tool into another tool and probably vice versa with other tools into Propeller.
So definitely a problem. Sometimes this is nice to see that, you know, you’re not the only one that’s running into these sorts of things.
Close that one.
Hopefully that’s my presentation I brought back.
Is that looking good? Yep cool thanks.
Alright section three, I just need a sip of water.
Okay.
Bring this back down to those of you in this room. What does this actually change for each role on a project team?
So we have four roles, four different sets of responsibility, four different ways to use this connected workflow that we’ve been talking about. And I’ll just do one example for each. But if there’s of course, if there’s questions on this, I can I’ll I’ll do my best to answer them.
Foreman and superintendents.
Sorry. I’ve I’ve lumped you you guys together in this one. Apologies. These are the guys that are making countless daily decisions in the field and briefing their crew about the plans.
Those morning briefings are often based on older survey data. Or maybe if you’re lucky, there’s a drone flight that happened last week.
With Propeller, that brief could be based on data from thirty minutes ago.
If that’s needed and if that has the potential to change the decisions that you make, that is possible in Propeller.
Project managers, right? A little higher level. These guys are often the ones that see their budgets start to drift. They’re the ones dealing with disputes among GCs and with owners that potentially are dragging on for much longer than they need to be.
For project managers, current site visibility by way of drone mapping and even just images taken in the field and uploaded to the propeller map can help you redirect spending potentially or move those dispute conversations along much faster because you have that added visual and quantitative evidence.
Site engineers. Right? These are the guys that very often care about design conformance. Monitoring progress towards design, rejigging things in the design file potentially to avoid conflicts, all of these things can have their start in the Propeller platform.
And lastly, survey leads, ones that are, you know, very near and dear to our hearts, of course. A fun fact, it’s pretty easy to tick off a survey lead. All you have to do is tell them that it’s gonna be a week before their survey’s done processing. They don’t like that very much. Propeller does do a really good job at minimizing that gap between the time that you give us the data and when you can actually measure on that data. In some situations, it’s a matter of minutes with, like, a small handheld scan, for example. And other times with massive drone surveys, it can be a few hours.
One question that does come up regardless of persona is how does this compare to other platforms? The honest answer is that DroneDeploy, Pix four d, you know, plenty of others in the space, they have that design overlay and cut fill features.
The difference in my opinion, and of course, I’m gonna be biased here, but this it’s in the specificity of those tools, which we’ve talked about a little bit already and how that fits in with the broader Propeller platform ecosystem.
But what else is there in the broader Propeller ecosystem?
Well, the main theme of this webinar is around progress tracking.
And I’m gonna try not to stray too far from that, but I am gonna take a fairly liberal definition of progress tracking here. Classically, of course, cut fill volumetrics. Right? But if we extend this out, you can technically track progress by standing in the same location on your site across some amount of time and snapping a photo with your phone. The good news is that Propeller supports this. And actually, the media section of Propeller, which is where if you snap a photo with your phone and you pin it to the map, that is my area of responsibility at the moment. And it’s an area that we’re investing very heavily at the moment.
What else? You could say markup. There’s a way to track progress with markup. And this was a feature that was released last year.
Trace over something with the draw tool, and then your next survey comes in, you overlay that exact same drawing on the map, and you observe it no longer covers the thing that you thought it did. It’s like something in the map has moved. That’s another form of progress tracking.
Forms, something else that’s coming later this year that we’re all very, very excited for.
Forms represent a snapshot in time, Comparing the info in a form now versus info in a different form last week, you could view this as another form, if I’m allowed to say that twice, of progress tracking.
Cool. Thank you everyone for being here. We’re gonna send the recording, the resources, some follow-up context to help you evaluate these workflows all hitting your inbox in the next day or so. But we can jump into a little bit of q and a.
Cool. And you all have access to submit your there’s little QA button. So I’ll give a few minutes for those to start rolling in.
So, like, the first one that we have, what’s a realistic oh, here.
Sorry.
Okay. We already fly drones weekly. What does Dirt Mate add on top of that? Is that complimentary or is it repetitive to what you’re already getting with the drone surveys?
So with Dirt Mate, obviously, you’re not getting an updated orthophoto. Right? So, like, the beautiful thing about flying drones is you’re taking actual RGB pictures, and we’re stitching that all together. You’re getting a nice picture of your site, and you’re getting an updated terrain model.
Just in terms of, like, updating surfaces, Dirt Mate does that every thirty minutes. If you have your fleet completely outfit in Dirt Mates that’s running around your site, you can kinda use the drone survey as, like, true up point. So you fly the drone, and then your dirt mates are running around your site. You’re getting updated terrain.
You can pull measurements at any point in time that you’d like.
And then you would do another drone survey, like, the following week, and that helps true everything up.
So, yeah, the the big benefit there is just the updated surface. So you have a very clear picture of what the terrain looks like on your site every thirty minutes with Dirt Mate.
Awesome. Thank you.
Okay, the next one we have is where does progress tracking within Propeller, is that tend to have the biggest impact? Is it more on the field side or is it more on the office side?
I think historically, it’s been more on the office side.
And I think the main reason I say that is the mobile app of select let me rephrase. The the field folks, right, foreman, superintendents, your your grade setters, like, all of those folks generally don’t bring laptops out to the field. Right? It’s like it’s in in my experience, at least, it’s smartphone and it’s iPad, which lends itself really nicely to the Propeller mobile app, not as well to Propeller desktop.
The Propeller mobile app is where we’ve been spending a lot of resources recently, actually. And as of late as of, like, a month or two ago, you can now see any measurements made on desktop in Propeller Mobile. And you can also pull quick measurements, but you can’t quite save them in Propeller Mobile yet and then have them flow back to desktop. So desktop’s just been, like, a more powerful solution for many, many years for us.
And only recently, Propeller Mobile has really been catching up. So it’s becoming more and more powerful for the field to be able to pull their own measurements just like that.
But I think right now, it’s probably still a little bit more heavily skewed towards office.
Awesome. Thank you.
Okay. We have a couple more. So keep sending those through the QA channel, and we will get to them.
The next one is what does a change order conversation look before and after, like, using Propeller to kind of address that?
So I haven’t done a ton of change orders. I’ve done a few, my limited experience. I’m sure everyone on this call has done had to deal with more than I have. But the nice thing is when you send an email that’s just text informing the GC or the owner about what’s happening and why work needs to diverge a little bit from the plans to, you know, accompany this unforeseen situation on-site. That request tends to go over a whole lot better when you come armed with a lot of evidence.
So if it is a big Earthworks operation and that’s the thing that’s involved in your change order, then having that live Dirt Mate data could help that conversation go a whole lot smoother when you bring that to the table. If it’s something more visual, having a time stamped, you know, watermarked image that is pinned to the map that’s at a certain date and time, that’s geographically correct on the map, and you’ve taken a photo and you’ve pinned that to the map, coming into the conversation with that bit of evidence drastically helped the situation. So, yeah, it’s just, I guess, point being here, the more evidence you can go into those change order conversations with, generally, the smoother they go.
Awesome. Thank you. K. So the next one is, what is the accuracy of topo elevation measurements? So this one’s like a multistep. You can also see it on your end.
Oh, yeah. I can see that one.
Says, how quickly can we fly the drone, download data, and compare elevations to proposed to find issues, errors, or discrepancies? Like a day, couple of days, a week.
Yeah. So let’s just take this in parts. So what is the accuracy of topo elevation measurements? So your an elevation measurement that you pull on your propeller map is only gonna be as accurate as the survey that is underneath your measurement, let’s say.
Right. So if you’re if you have a one of our drones that we recommend, if if accuracy is of the highest importance to you. You could fly a Mavic three, a Wingtra, an m four hundred, like, some something like, you know, get in touch with our team, and we we’re happy to make recommendations with sufficient ground control, using PPK accuracy, then you can have a very, very accurate model that’s under a tenth of a foot measured, like, however way you measure it. So you can have very, very accurate topo elevations regardless of where you pull it on the survey.
That changes, of course, if you fly with an unrecommended drone or you do a handheld scan that doesn’t have any RTK or PPK accuracy. Right? And those are great visually, but probably won’t pull the most accurate of topo elevations.
How quickly can we fly the drone, download data, and compare elevations to propose to find issues, air or discrepancies? So flying the drone, I mean, I I don’t have the math up in front of me, but we have a number of internal calculators that we could help run this for you. But a rel like, you could pop the drone up in the air and take five hundred photos in twenty minutes, ten, twenty minutes, and then you park the drone, get the data off the SD card into Propeller, depending on your Internet speed. That can be slow or fast to do the actual upload.
And then I think we still say twenty four hours, but I haven’t seen a dataset turnaround in more than twenty four hours that didn’t have, like, significant errors in quite a long time. It’s generally very, very quick. So, like, expected, you know, a couple hours, few hours.
You have that survey data back that includes your orthophoto, your point cloud, your terrain, everything that you would need to pull measurements accurately.
So compare elevations to proposed. So proposed would be your design file. So as long as your design file, you can export that in a DXF or an XML among, you know, plenty of other different types of files.
Even if they’re just points in the design file, you could import a CSV to Propeller and make that point to point comparison. That all can happen in a matter of minutes.
Yeah. Hopefully, that’s enough to answer your question.
Awesome. Thank you.
Okay. Right now, I have two more questions, so keep sending them through. We do have the time.
Are there project types or sizes of projects where this is a better fit than others?
This meaning dirt mate or just propeller in general, do you think?
I think you could probably go into both. Assuming the dirt mate phrasing, but you could probably touch on both.
Yeah. Maybe I’ll start with just Propeller as a whole. So on itty bitty sites, right, and maybe in extremely urban environments, or projects that are really, really close to an airport. Like, I know it’s virtually impossible to fly a drone near Washington DC, for example.
Those types of projects probably doesn’t make sense to pop a drone up in the air and collect your survey data that way. The good news is that it was the case for a long time that you needed a drone survey in order for Propeller to be valuable. Happy to report that’s no longer the case. You could still set up your site in Propeller, jump into it even if it is a very small site or in a no fly zone, and you’re immediately put on the base You’re not blocked from doing anything.
You can upload your design files. If you’ve done hand topos in the area, grab those, upload those to Repeller, and view those as survey data. Different visualizations, like elevation map, gradient map. You can even run a hydrology report on your hand topo that you did, all in Propeller.
So those projects, great. Run them in Propeller. It’s it’s it’s fantastic. Dirt Mate, obviously not super relevant to the, you know, the tiny little one block by one block type projects.
Hopefully, Tay and Tristan, who are on the Dirt Mate team on our team, don’t get mad at me for saying that. There might be applications that I don’t know about. But I think Dirt Mate does really shine on the much larger earthmoving mining, you know, those type of operations. But, again, that’s where Propeller got our start in these, you know, really big earthworks type projects. But in recent years, even the, you know, the small one block by one block projects are you know, we we see plenty of those now from our customers in Propeller, which is great.
Awesome. Good stuff. Thank you. So our final question that I have right now.
So for progress tracking, how long does it realistically take for implementation across the teams?
So, like, Propeller implementation?
Yeah. So So like, buy in from office team, field team.
Yeah. So, I mean, with any new software, it’s probably gonna take some time for it to really spread its roots in the organization, some quicker than others.
There maybe I’ll just touch on one thing that tends to help. So, like, one of the things we’ve heard is that people don’t want to remember or store another username and password. Right? Like, that’s classic. If it requires a login, it’s probably not gonna get used as much as it could have. And, you know, that’s fair enough.
To get the most out of Propeller, like, both in the desktop and in the Propeller mobile app, You do need to log in, you need have an account, and that really opens up a world of possibilities.
We do have one feature that I love to talk about that, you know, people are getting a lot of value out of, and that’s crew. So crew is essentially a screenshot on steroids, for lack of a better term. You configure your propeller platform however you’d like with as many measurements, as many design files, you know, whatever you’d like turned on. You configure that view in in on, like, on your computer.
You click generate crew link. It packages up everything into a single URL that you can share with anyone, your mom, your grandma, doesn’t matter. Foreman, superintendents on-site, of course, probably more relevant.
And if when they click on that link, they are taken directly to the map in the view that you have configured for them, which is great. No login necessary. They can click on the measurements. They can see the cut fill that is shown within that measurement.
They can turn on and off the design files, but only the ones that you’ve configured in your view in Propeller, which is great. Little things like that, like the not needing to log in, really provide a nice entry point, sort of like the gateway drug, that helps people come online, see the value. And then if they want more afterwards, then, you know, you go down the path of, like, maybe a formal training session, loop in one of our tech support or one of our CSMs that can help you get up and running. And we’ve hosted sessions for very, very large organizations and done q and a’s in those. You know, support is something we really like to hang our hat on. So, like, if there’s anything we can do to help get your organization up to speed, that’s great.
One other thing that’s really helped onboard that I like to talk about is invite links. So, you know, you log into a platform and you wanna invite your buddy. You type in their email, you give them a certain number of permissions, and you click send.
Then, you know, they get an invite, they create an account, and then they’re in. One thing that we’ve done is you can actually assign permissions to a link. So not to a person, but to a link. You assign the permissions to a link, and then you can send that link in a big Teams channel, to an email that you send out to a certain, you know, team within your organization. And then anyone who clicks on that link immediately has the permissions. So just, like, little things like that to make it easier to get into Propeller, I think, really helps.
Awesome. Thank you. Okay. I don’t see any other questions on my end.
So this is really great. Thanks, everyone, for joining. So if any of this sounds good or you’re thinking this could potentially make sense on any of your sites, there’s a little link above.
Jack’s head says just like set up a fifteen minute call so it’d be quick. And then we can go through more personalized like, understanding of what kind of is going on in your sites, where this fits in or could fit in.
I’ll download this recording. I’ll share it with all of you in your inbox so that you can view it later along with some other relevant, like, progress or progress tracking pieces of content. I’ll also have a link if you’re interested in these sessions. We have lovely people like Jack talking about lovely things relevant to Earthworks.
Yeah. So you can expect that in your inbox shortly. Just have to process this video.
Yeah. Anything else to add on your end, Jack? This was really good.
Yeah. Thanks everyone for joining.
Appreciate it. Awesome. Thank you.
